The Union Cabinet is set to meet soon to decide if beleaguered state-owned carrier Air India should retain its 'national' character at all. It will also debate if strategic disinvestment is the best way forward for the airline, which is estimated to have accumulated Rs 7,200 crore in losses in 2009-10.
With most of Air India's woes emanating from its international operations - where it loses around Rs 3,000 crore a year on 30 routes - a group of ministers (GoM), chaired by finance minister Pranab Mukherjee, has recommended that the airline stop flying to these routes.
"This will change the character of Air India," a government functionary said, adding this would turn Air India into a regional airline.
The civil aviation ministry is preparing a detailed note for the Cabinet on the carrier's financial health and turnaround measures recommended by the GoM. "Cutting down loss-making international routes will have serious implications. Basically, the government has to decide if Air India continues to fly abroad or within India alone," the source said.
At the same time, the Cabinet may also debate the issue of strategic disinvestment as a long-term viable option for the carrier.
"The government cannot pump money into the National Aviation Company of India Ltd (Nacil) forever," the government source said. But, it is likely that the Cabinet refers back some of these issues to the GoM for its detailed and considered opinion, the source added.
A major blow to Nacil's finances comes from prestigious but loss-making daily non-stop flights to New York from Delhi and Mumbai on the latest long-range fleet of Boeing, accounting for losses to the tune of Rs 750 crore a year.
The GoM, set up to monitor Air India's turnaround plan, was also to decide on the politically sensitive matter of wage cuts of Air India's 31,000 employees. But it has now left the decision for the Cabinet.
To avail government bailout, the carrier was asked to undertake cost-cutting measures that would help it save around Rs 2,000 crore by March 2010. Air India was able to cut costs to the tune of Rs 700-800 crore till December last year.
As part of its turnaround strategy, the carrier has shortlisted five candidates for the post of chief commercial. A newly formed interview panel will interview these candidates on March 27
The carrier recently received a shot in the arm with the government releasing Rs 400 crore as a first tranche towards equity infusion. Air India had asked for Rs 5,000 crore as equity infusion and a letter of comfort from the government to convert its high-cost debt into low-cost ones.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Galaxy with Key to Milky Way Creation Found... ...
A team of scientists from the UK and the US has discovered a galaxy far away from us which is churning out stars 250 times faster than our Milky Way. The discovery of the galaxy, about 10 billion light years away from the earth, will help researchers understand how the Milky Way was formed.
Galaxy SMM J2135- 0102 has four distinct star- forming regions, each of which is 100 times brighter than Milky Way locations such as the Orion Nebula. The team which discovered the galaxy was led by scientists from the UK's Durham University.
It also included researchers from European Southern University and the Massachusetts based Harvard- Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics." The new galaxy is forming stars at about 250 suns per year. Our Milky Way is forming about two suns per year," lead scientist Mark Swinbank of Durham University said. Because of the time it takes light to reach the earth, the scientists observed the galaxy as it would have appeared 10 billion years ago - just three billion years after the Big Bang.
It was Milky Way- sized at the time. But today, 10 billion years later, it would have grown into a giant elliptical galaxy much more massive than the Milky Way." When we look at the stars in the Milky Way, we find that most are about 10 billion years old. So, to understand how the Milky Way was formed, we must look back to these times. In this study, we have done just that," Swinbank said. "The main result of our study is that we have located four individual star- forming regions.
Each of these regions is forming stars much more rapidly than we would expect, given their sizes. In essence, the regions are much more efficient at forming stars than we typically see in the local universe," he said. The findings indicate star formation was more vigorous in the early universe. The paper was published on Sunday in the science journal Nature.
Galaxy SMM J2135- 0102 has four distinct star- forming regions, each of which is 100 times brighter than Milky Way locations such as the Orion Nebula. The team which discovered the galaxy was led by scientists from the UK's Durham University.
It also included researchers from European Southern University and the Massachusetts based Harvard- Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics." The new galaxy is forming stars at about 250 suns per year. Our Milky Way is forming about two suns per year," lead scientist Mark Swinbank of Durham University said. Because of the time it takes light to reach the earth, the scientists observed the galaxy as it would have appeared 10 billion years ago - just three billion years after the Big Bang.
It was Milky Way- sized at the time. But today, 10 billion years later, it would have grown into a giant elliptical galaxy much more massive than the Milky Way." When we look at the stars in the Milky Way, we find that most are about 10 billion years old. So, to understand how the Milky Way was formed, we must look back to these times. In this study, we have done just that," Swinbank said. "The main result of our study is that we have located four individual star- forming regions.
Each of these regions is forming stars much more rapidly than we would expect, given their sizes. In essence, the regions are much more efficient at forming stars than we typically see in the local universe," he said. The findings indicate star formation was more vigorous in the early universe. The paper was published on Sunday in the science journal Nature.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
A Peek at Next-Generation Agni-V... ...
Shrouded in secrecy for its political implications, the first visual impressions of India's most ambitious nuclear delivery system, the Agni-5 ballistic missile, are out. Officials with the Agni programme in Hyderabad confirmed the pictures were an accurate depiction of the in- development weapon.
On February 10, Agni programme director Dr Avinash Chander had told Headlines Today, "The Agni-5 looks similar to the Agni-3, except that it is longer as a result of an additional propulsion stage."
Still at least a year away from its first test-firing-an official estimate says February 2011- the Agni-5 has already acquired a formidable global reputation. In October last year, in its first ever reference to an Indian weapon programme, China's state-owned People's Daily newspaper pointed out that "India's Agni-5 missile is highly road-mobile, and effectively puts Harbin, China's northernmost city within striking range."
The Agni-5 is being built to deliver a nuclear warhead out to ranges of 5,000-6,000/ km. Sources reveal that 60 per cent of the first Agni-5 missile system is complete, with work now focused on the weapon's crucial third stage. Scientists are currently tweaking the missile's payload structure, introducing extra heating and making alterations to the re- entry mechanism.
The missile will also be India's first to be propelled by a composite rocket motor as opposed to a metallic one. With the 3,500-km-range Agni-3 to enter service with India's Strategic Forces Command- which governs all nuclear weapons- this year, the Agni-5 will be put through a similar four-flight trial between 2011-2013.
On February 10, Agni programme director Dr Avinash Chander had told Headlines Today, "The Agni-5 looks similar to the Agni-3, except that it is longer as a result of an additional propulsion stage."
Still at least a year away from its first test-firing-an official estimate says February 2011- the Agni-5 has already acquired a formidable global reputation. In October last year, in its first ever reference to an Indian weapon programme, China's state-owned People's Daily newspaper pointed out that "India's Agni-5 missile is highly road-mobile, and effectively puts Harbin, China's northernmost city within striking range."
The Agni-5 is being built to deliver a nuclear warhead out to ranges of 5,000-6,000/ km. Sources reveal that 60 per cent of the first Agni-5 missile system is complete, with work now focused on the weapon's crucial third stage. Scientists are currently tweaking the missile's payload structure, introducing extra heating and making alterations to the re- entry mechanism.
The missile will also be India's first to be propelled by a composite rocket motor as opposed to a metallic one. With the 3,500-km-range Agni-3 to enter service with India's Strategic Forces Command- which governs all nuclear weapons- this year, the Agni-5 will be put through a similar four-flight trial between 2011-2013.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Dinosaur Country....... ..
India has turned out to be agold mine of clues - from an abundance of eggs to tell - tale dung - to the lives of dinos.
The discovery of an ancient dinosaur-eating snake species from a Gujarat village that made international headlines this past week was not a chance discovery. It was one more piece, a significant one at that, in the slowly unfolding jigsaw puzzle of India's fascinating fossil heritage.
Most Indians may not know that the geological history of Indian dinosaurs spans the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous ages - spanning from about 230 million to 65 million years ago. In fact, some of the first fossils that were recognised as those of dinosaurs were found in India way back in 1828. The fossils - discovered by a British army officer William Sleeman, who was better known for wiping out the 'thuggee' menace, in Jabalpur - were described by the Scottish missionary Stephen Hislop in scientific literature in 1859. The species was later named Titanosaurus indicus.
Since that discovery, scientists with the Geological Survey of India ( GSI) have found remains of dinosaurs belonging to different ages of the "era of reptiles" which is believed to have come to an end some 65 million years ago. In popular psyche, dinosaurs are invariably connected with the Jurassic period - the middle age of the geological times - scale - made famous in sci- fi movies.
But the Triassic period extended from 250 to 200 million years ago, followed by Jurassic, which spanned from 145 to 200 million years. It was followed by the Cretaceous period extending from 145 to 65 million years ago. This is supposed to have been the golden age of dinosaurs, which came to an end with a massive asteroid hitting the planet. Indian dinosaurs are believed to have been wiped out by the Deccan volcanic eruption.
Though fossils found in India belong to all three ages, most of them are from the late Cretaceous period. Over the years, GSI scientists have found bones, skeletons, well- preserved eggs, egg shell debris, dung and other fossil fragments in western and central India, and even in the south. Fossilised footprints, or trackways, of the gargantuan creatures have not been found in any dinosaur- bearing sediments in India.
The earliest discovery of dinosaurs eggs were made from the Lameta sediments in the Kheda district of Gujarat in 1981.
Scientists were exploring the region for fossils in the area near Balasinor village, which had limestone quarries operated by the cement company, ACC. "A big boulder fell apart when the mine was blasted. I noticed that it contained seveneight spherical pieces. It was almost as if some eggs had been kept in a basket," recalls Dhananjay M. Mohabey, senior paleontologist with the GSI. "We did not know how dinosaur eggs looked like. This was the first time we were seeing something like this."
This discovery led to a resurgence of dinosaurs research in India, leading to a spate of finds belonging to the Late Cretaceous period in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh in the past three decades. A sole occurrence of a single egg has been recorded from the Ariyalur area in Tamil Nadu - the only record of an Indian dinosaur egg from marine sediments.
As many as 10,000 dinosaur eggs have been found at different nesting sites in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra.
Scientists believe that there could be up to 30,000 eggs at different locations. Most of these eggs belong to the titanosaurus. Eggs, nests and nesting sites provide an insight into the social and nesting behaviour of this class of dinosaurs.
These animals used to bury their eggs in soft sands near riverbanks and in a few rare nests, eggs have been found arranged in circular or linear patterns.
From dung found around Pisdura village near Nagpur, scientists have inferred what the herbivore dinosaurs used to eat. An analysis of this dung, in fact, revealed the remains of a grass family which turned out to be the oldest record of grasses found anywhere in the world.
"Evidence suggests that the environment during the Late Cretaceous period in India provided an ideal habitat for breeding and nesting of dinosaurs. But these reptiles were struggling to survive the initial onslaught caused by the Deccan volcanic eruption near the end of the Cretaceous period," explains Mohabey, who first found a complex set of fossils at Dholi Dungri village in Gujarat in 1987. It has now turned out to be that of an ancient snake along with fossils of crushed eggs and dino hatchlings. The Indian dinosaur eggs and plant- bearing dung are unique in the world for their diversity and abundance and offer promising material for future research on dinosaurs.
Most eggs found in India belong to the plant-eating sauropod dinosaurs, but the country was also home to carnivore dinosaurs as well. The most remarkable discovery of a carnivore is that of Rajasaurus narmadensis - a new species found at Rahioli village in the Narmada basin of Gujarat. The discovery represents the first skull ever assembled of a dinosaur of any kind in India.
Rajasaurus narmadensis - which means "regal dinosaur from the Narmada" - was a significant predator that was related to species on continental Africa, Madagascar and South America.
The discovery of this 65-millionyear-old was a joint effort of Suresh Srivastava of GSI, Ashok Sahni of Panjab University, Chandigarh, and Jeff Wilson of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ( USA). The stocky, 30-foot dinosaur had an unusual head crest and would have pursued a diet that included the long-necked sauropoddinosaurs that roamed the Narmadaregion. F INDING A dinosaur fossil, reconstructing the evidence and then presenting the find to scientific community is a long, torturous process that could sometimes take decades. Geologists look for dinosaur fossils in different rock sediments which have already been mapped. Systematic excavation of such areas is undertaken and when fossils are found the location is carefully mapped before the fossils are labeled and removed from there.
The rocks are scanned to see presence of bones. Then the rock sediments are removed through mechanical and chemical processes.
This prepares the fossils for reconstruction, body part by body part such as skull, jaw, limbs, pelvis, and so on. Fossils of associated including plants, flowers and animals are also studied in detail.
Only after this long process can anyone claim to have found a dinosaur fossil. Many a times false announcements are made. GSI scientists, for instance, clarify that the egg fossils reported last year from Tamil Nadu didn't belong to dinosaurs. The science of paleontology isn't as exciting as they make it out to be in the sci- fi movies.
The discovery of an ancient dinosaur-eating snake species from a Gujarat village that made international headlines this past week was not a chance discovery. It was one more piece, a significant one at that, in the slowly unfolding jigsaw puzzle of India's fascinating fossil heritage.
Most Indians may not know that the geological history of Indian dinosaurs spans the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous ages - spanning from about 230 million to 65 million years ago. In fact, some of the first fossils that were recognised as those of dinosaurs were found in India way back in 1828. The fossils - discovered by a British army officer William Sleeman, who was better known for wiping out the 'thuggee' menace, in Jabalpur - were described by the Scottish missionary Stephen Hislop in scientific literature in 1859. The species was later named Titanosaurus indicus.
Since that discovery, scientists with the Geological Survey of India ( GSI) have found remains of dinosaurs belonging to different ages of the "era of reptiles" which is believed to have come to an end some 65 million years ago. In popular psyche, dinosaurs are invariably connected with the Jurassic period - the middle age of the geological times - scale - made famous in sci- fi movies.
But the Triassic period extended from 250 to 200 million years ago, followed by Jurassic, which spanned from 145 to 200 million years. It was followed by the Cretaceous period extending from 145 to 65 million years ago. This is supposed to have been the golden age of dinosaurs, which came to an end with a massive asteroid hitting the planet. Indian dinosaurs are believed to have been wiped out by the Deccan volcanic eruption.
Though fossils found in India belong to all three ages, most of them are from the late Cretaceous period. Over the years, GSI scientists have found bones, skeletons, well- preserved eggs, egg shell debris, dung and other fossil fragments in western and central India, and even in the south. Fossilised footprints, or trackways, of the gargantuan creatures have not been found in any dinosaur- bearing sediments in India.
The earliest discovery of dinosaurs eggs were made from the Lameta sediments in the Kheda district of Gujarat in 1981.
Scientists were exploring the region for fossils in the area near Balasinor village, which had limestone quarries operated by the cement company, ACC. "A big boulder fell apart when the mine was blasted. I noticed that it contained seveneight spherical pieces. It was almost as if some eggs had been kept in a basket," recalls Dhananjay M. Mohabey, senior paleontologist with the GSI. "We did not know how dinosaur eggs looked like. This was the first time we were seeing something like this."
This discovery led to a resurgence of dinosaurs research in India, leading to a spate of finds belonging to the Late Cretaceous period in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh in the past three decades. A sole occurrence of a single egg has been recorded from the Ariyalur area in Tamil Nadu - the only record of an Indian dinosaur egg from marine sediments.
As many as 10,000 dinosaur eggs have been found at different nesting sites in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra.
Scientists believe that there could be up to 30,000 eggs at different locations. Most of these eggs belong to the titanosaurus. Eggs, nests and nesting sites provide an insight into the social and nesting behaviour of this class of dinosaurs.
These animals used to bury their eggs in soft sands near riverbanks and in a few rare nests, eggs have been found arranged in circular or linear patterns.
From dung found around Pisdura village near Nagpur, scientists have inferred what the herbivore dinosaurs used to eat. An analysis of this dung, in fact, revealed the remains of a grass family which turned out to be the oldest record of grasses found anywhere in the world.
"Evidence suggests that the environment during the Late Cretaceous period in India provided an ideal habitat for breeding and nesting of dinosaurs. But these reptiles were struggling to survive the initial onslaught caused by the Deccan volcanic eruption near the end of the Cretaceous period," explains Mohabey, who first found a complex set of fossils at Dholi Dungri village in Gujarat in 1987. It has now turned out to be that of an ancient snake along with fossils of crushed eggs and dino hatchlings. The Indian dinosaur eggs and plant- bearing dung are unique in the world for their diversity and abundance and offer promising material for future research on dinosaurs.
Most eggs found in India belong to the plant-eating sauropod dinosaurs, but the country was also home to carnivore dinosaurs as well. The most remarkable discovery of a carnivore is that of Rajasaurus narmadensis - a new species found at Rahioli village in the Narmada basin of Gujarat. The discovery represents the first skull ever assembled of a dinosaur of any kind in India.
Rajasaurus narmadensis - which means "regal dinosaur from the Narmada" - was a significant predator that was related to species on continental Africa, Madagascar and South America.
The discovery of this 65-millionyear-old was a joint effort of Suresh Srivastava of GSI, Ashok Sahni of Panjab University, Chandigarh, and Jeff Wilson of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ( USA). The stocky, 30-foot dinosaur had an unusual head crest and would have pursued a diet that included the long-necked sauropoddinosaurs that roamed the Narmadaregion. F INDING A dinosaur fossil, reconstructing the evidence and then presenting the find to scientific community is a long, torturous process that could sometimes take decades. Geologists look for dinosaur fossils in different rock sediments which have already been mapped. Systematic excavation of such areas is undertaken and when fossils are found the location is carefully mapped before the fossils are labeled and removed from there.
The rocks are scanned to see presence of bones. Then the rock sediments are removed through mechanical and chemical processes.
This prepares the fossils for reconstruction, body part by body part such as skull, jaw, limbs, pelvis, and so on. Fossils of associated including plants, flowers and animals are also studied in detail.
Only after this long process can anyone claim to have found a dinosaur fossil. Many a times false announcements are made. GSI scientists, for instance, clarify that the egg fossils reported last year from Tamil Nadu didn't belong to dinosaurs. The science of paleontology isn't as exciting as they make it out to be in the sci- fi movies.
M.F. Hussain's Paintings... Judge Yourself...... ..
If a person dresses like a Sikh Guru, thousands of Sikhs gather and destroy their establishments , threaten to kill him, announce a bounty on his head - Sikhs are not criticised for being communal and intolerant.
If a Danish journalist depicts the Prophet of the Muslims , Muslims all over the world rise in anger, there is violence, a booty on the head of the Journalist - Muslims are not criticised for being communal and intolerant.
If MF Hussain draws paintings depciting Hindu Gods and Goddesses positions (which relations are not borne out by ancient texts at all ) and Hindus merely protest , they are called communal, intolerant and taught lessons in secularism by one and all.
The problem apparently is not with Sikhs and Muslims, it is with us, the Hindus, because we are not violent, we accept whatever is dished out to us , we do not have the guts to say that this is wrong , we seek acceptance from outsiders rather than from our conscience. We worship the same Gods and Godesses but don't stand up for them when the time comes.
Be a judge of Hussain' s paintings below.
Goddess Durga ######### union with Tiger
Prophet ' s Daughter Fatima fully clothed
Goddess Lakshmi naked on Shree Ganesh ' s head
M.F. Hussain ' s Mother fully clothed
Naked Saraswati
Mother Teresa fully clothed
Naked Shri Parvati
Hussain ' s Daughter well clothed
Naked Draupadi
Well clothed Muslim Lady
Naked Lord Hanuman and Goddess Sita sitting on thigh of Ravana
Muslim poets Faiz, Galib are shown well-! clothed
Full Clad Muslim King and naked Hindu Brahmin. The above painting clearly indicates Hussain ' s tendency to paint any Hindu as naked and thus his hatred
Naked Bharatmata - Hussain has shown naked woman with names of states written on different parts of her body. He has used Ashok Chakra, Tri-colour in the painting. By doing this he has violated law & hurt National Pride of Indians. Both these things should be of grave concern to every Indian irrespective of his religion
Out of the four leaders M. Gandhi is decapitated and Hitler is naked. Hussain hates Hitler and has said in an interview 8 years ago that he has depicted Hitler naked to humiliate him and as he deserves it ! How come Hitler ' s nudity cause humiliation when in Hussain ' s own statement nudity in art depicts purity and is in fact an honour ! This shows Hussain ' s perversion and hypocrisy
If a Danish journalist depicts the Prophet of the Muslims , Muslims all over the world rise in anger, there is violence, a booty on the head of the Journalist - Muslims are not criticised for being communal and intolerant.
If MF Hussain draws paintings depciting Hindu Gods and Goddesses positions (which relations are not borne out by ancient texts at all ) and Hindus merely protest , they are called communal, intolerant and taught lessons in secularism by one and all.
The problem apparently is not with Sikhs and Muslims, it is with us, the Hindus, because we are not violent, we accept whatever is dished out to us , we do not have the guts to say that this is wrong , we seek acceptance from outsiders rather than from our conscience. We worship the same Gods and Godesses but don't stand up for them when the time comes.
Be a judge of Hussain' s paintings below.
Goddess Durga ######### union with Tiger
Prophet ' s Daughter Fatima fully clothed
Goddess Lakshmi naked on Shree Ganesh ' s head
M.F. Hussain ' s Mother fully clothed
Naked Saraswati
Mother Teresa fully clothed
Naked Shri Parvati
Hussain ' s Daughter well clothed
Naked Draupadi
Well clothed Muslim Lady
Naked Lord Hanuman and Goddess Sita sitting on thigh of Ravana
Muslim poets Faiz, Galib are shown well-! clothed
Full Clad Muslim King and naked Hindu Brahmin. The above painting clearly indicates Hussain ' s tendency to paint any Hindu as naked and thus his hatred
Naked Bharatmata - Hussain has shown naked woman with names of states written on different parts of her body. He has used Ashok Chakra, Tri-colour in the painting. By doing this he has violated law & hurt National Pride of Indians. Both these things should be of grave concern to every Indian irrespective of his religion
Out of the four leaders M. Gandhi is decapitated and Hitler is naked. Hussain hates Hitler and has said in an interview 8 years ago that he has depicted Hitler naked to humiliate him and as he deserves it ! How come Hitler ' s nudity cause humiliation when in Hussain ' s own statement nudity in art depicts purity and is in fact an honour ! This shows Hussain ' s perversion and hypocrisy
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Not Quite Up In the Air.. ...
After people around the world reacted strongly to American low-cost carrier Southwest Airlines giving director Kevin Smith the boot because he was 'too fat to fly', it has now emerged that Air Canada Jazz deplaned a passenger earlier this month for being 'too smelly'. The flight was waiting for takeoff when some passengers complained about the odour. Efforts were made to isolate the man from other passengers, but flight officials eventually decided to ask him to get off the plane. The man in question apparently lost his stink overnight and was allowed to fly the next morning.
So are airlines correct in refusing passengers who in their view cause inconvenience to fellow travelers? Opinion seems to be divided. Some sympathise with the deplaned passengers. They feel they don't deserve to be humiliated in such a manner. After all, economy seats in most airlines are barely big enough to comfortably seat someone who weighs 60 kgs. So isn't it then the airlines' onus to provide decently sized seating options to all passengers? Echoing this one Facebook status message says that 'Airlines need to make seats that will fit at least 85% of the population.'
On the 'smelly' passenger matter, some netizens feel that if the person concerned had a medical issue, then the treatment meted out by airline staff was definitely too harsh. On the other hand, some believe that well-being of the group is always more important than that of an individual, and that if the passenger actually smelt that bad then the action taken by the authorities was correct.
What do you think? What should Airline policy be towards passengers like Smith or the Air Canada Jazz passenger?
So are airlines correct in refusing passengers who in their view cause inconvenience to fellow travelers? Opinion seems to be divided. Some sympathise with the deplaned passengers. They feel they don't deserve to be humiliated in such a manner. After all, economy seats in most airlines are barely big enough to comfortably seat someone who weighs 60 kgs. So isn't it then the airlines' onus to provide decently sized seating options to all passengers? Echoing this one Facebook status message says that 'Airlines need to make seats that will fit at least 85% of the population.'
On the 'smelly' passenger matter, some netizens feel that if the person concerned had a medical issue, then the treatment meted out by airline staff was definitely too harsh. On the other hand, some believe that well-being of the group is always more important than that of an individual, and that if the passenger actually smelt that bad then the action taken by the authorities was correct.
What do you think? What should Airline policy be towards passengers like Smith or the Air Canada Jazz passenger?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)